Sun Gazette, Letter to the Editor:
If Board Isn’t Owned By Developers, It Is Rented by Them Tuesday, October 18, 2011 9:30 am
Editor: Your Oct. 13 endorsement of Democrats Mary Hynes and Walter Tejada for re-election to the County Board started out as a well-reasoned indictment of the incumbent Democrats for their failure to address substantive issues (“too stuck in the weeds on issues where the big-picture view is sorely needed”), and for their sponsorship of a failed Columbia Pike trolley idea.
Then, you rapidly went off into outer space, delivering nonsense instead of your usually excellent analysis.
You criticized Green Party candidate Audrey Clement for her notion of “the popular but laughable refrain that developers are the real power behind the scene in Arlington.”
Oh really? I would like the Sun Gazette to cite just one major development project that Democrats Hynes and Tejada have halted or opposed in their years on County Board. In the past two years, Hynes and Tejada supported a 50-percent increase in density (i.e. development) in Crystal City and increased density around the East Falls Church Metro station.
May I ask where the children of the thousands of new Crystal City residents will go to public school, with nearby Oakridge Elementary School using 116 percent of its capacity this school year?
In August, another Democratic politician, state Senate candidate Jaime Areizaga-Soto, in his primary race against current Democratic County Board member Barbara Favola, accurately described the dollars that she received from her developer friends.
If the current County Board is not “owned” by the developers and related business interests, then perhaps they are “rented”: involved in a cozy, incestuous relationship that puts the interests of the broad Arlington community last, and the profits of the developers first.
Arlington Greens have consistently said that the County Board’s regulation of developers does not take a holistic approach, counting all the social, environmental, transportation, housing and secondary financial costs of development on the Arlington community.
Our pubic schools are overcrowded; our streets are congested during rush-hour; the Metrorail system is running dangerously beyond its own rush-hour capacity; and many moderate-income residents are displaced owing to higher rents and taxes.
Under these circumstances, do we want a County Board that routinely rubber-stamps site plans, or one that looks skeptically and rigorously at any new development?
The Occupy Wall Street protests in recent months throughout the U.S. highlighted that the lower-income 99-percent of Americans are dissatisfied with an incumbent government that protects the business interests and wealthy, and shifts those costs onto the middle class.
We need an Occupy Arlington Courthouse movement to turn our rascals out of local office here in Arlington as well. Vote Green this year.
John Reeder, Arlington
Reeder is chairman of the Arlington Greens.
http://www.sungazette.net/arlington/commentary/if-board-isn-t-owned-by-developers-it-is-rented/article_d8bc5800-f977-11e0-9e06-001cc4c002e0.html